CONSULTING
Team and case supervision
"I see what you don't see." What sounds like a simple child's play is often anything but in the everyday life of teams and organizations. Frequently, the reasonable clarification of the current situationally appropriate view degenerates into a power struggle for the only correct meaning – with far-reaching "risks and side effects" for team dynamics, motivation, and performance.
Supervision is a methodologically developed and widely established container to...
-
irritate entrenched attitudes.
-
focus effectively on new goals.
-
communicate with each other about what is valid.
-
keep the shared vision alive.
Supervision effectively contributes to the development of your company into a "learning organization." Good supervision coordinates and integrates this development at the following levels (see the classification developed at MIT by Senge/ Fullan e.a.):
-
Personal development: Only the formation of each individual, only the lifelong development of one's own personality, ultimately provides a solid basis for a "learning organization."
-
Shared vision: Only to the extent that all parties really agree on the goals of their company will a stronger motivation for working together arise.
-
Team learning: On the basis of mutual appreciation, team members can reach a common understanding. If the "TEAM" is understood as the mission "to master one task a day, " the "intelligence of the group" can unfold. (einfügen oder Link zur Team-Uhr)
-
Mental models: An "agile organization" requires and demands a sufficient inner openness to change processes. However, this often requires the demanding work with entrenched pre-suppositions.
-
Systemic thinking: If the view is on the individual and the whole ("the trees and the forest"), the inner image also changes: from monocausal patterns of interpretation to the multi-layered networks of human development processes.
